New insane ICCF Rating system

ICCF members can discuss the ICCF and any Chess related matters that interest them.

Moderators: Elijah, Igbo, timetraveller

chaosparadigm
Forum Contributions
Points: 10 056,00 
Posts: 86
Joined: 04/11/2019, 16:17
Status: Offline (Active 3 Weeks, 6 Days, 23 Hours, 1 Minute ago)
Topics: 7
Reputation: 235
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 306 times

New insane ICCF Rating system

Post by chaosparadigm »

Just read the new ICCF rating system files.

Am I misunderstanding something or is it literally possible to lose over 30 rating points in one tournament for 13 draws as the top seed? We all know this result is the most probably outcome as NO ONE takes risks with the top seed.
Kater Carlo

Top contribute Forum
Forum Contributions
Points: 17 742,00 
Posts: 83
Joined: 04/11/2019, 18:06
Status: Offline (Active 18 Hours, 31 Minutes ago)
Medals: 1
Topics: 6
Reputation: 160
Has thanked: 383 times
Been thanked: 292 times

New insane ICCF Rating system

Post by Kater Carlo »

It is totally possible. ELO does no longer work in its current version to predict the outcome of games properly.
If you have a higher ELO and still play against people who have ratings much lower than yours and use stockfish,
you can only loose ELO points. One has to take into account, that over 90% of all corr games end in a draw.
Therefore draws should not count for ELO calculations in corr chess. Even after a death or a withdrawal from tournament results should not be used for ELO. Anyway, it is still a long way to go for ICCF to come to proper conclusions. slt
chaosparadigm
Forum Contributions
Points: 10 056,00 
Posts: 86
Joined: 04/11/2019, 16:17
Status: Offline (Active 3 Weeks, 6 Days, 23 Hours, 1 Minute ago)
Topics: 7
Reputation: 235
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 306 times

New insane ICCF Rating system

Post by chaosparadigm »

Exactly draws should not count.

This new rating system is a disaster and 20 steps backwards. It will cause deflation, less games to be played and many players will retire or become even more picky about the events they play.

The only rating system that makes any sense is to have draws either not count AT ALL or to count them almost not at all. It is normal AND common for a 1700 to draw a 2300 in corr.

When I started playing corr 17 years ago, the draw rate was about ~70% now the draw rate is 97%. Many high end tournaments end with a single decisive game.

So we should have an event where 2nd place finishers lose 30 rating points for drawing all their games?!
Post Reply

Return to “International Correspondence Chess Federation”